Under the guise of trying to protect children from exposure to material of sexual or lifestyle nature, we are seeing educational censorship and books being banned in school and public libraries, including writings by renowned authors. We also need to recognize that this type of legislation is being introduced at a time when restrictions are being placed on the classroom discussion of topics related to diversity, inclusion, race and lifestyle. At a time when we are facing major shortages in the healthcare sector across the country, and alternate care providers are not available, this may lead to denied healthcare access. Thus, care could be denied based on a person’s gender identity or the practitioner’s view of the patient’s lifestyle practices. Some of these bills specifically state that practitioner care may not be denied based on race, religion, or sex, but many legislators do not consider gender identity in their definition of sex, a belief that is at variance with federal law. This has made its way into legislation in the form of so-called physician “right of conscience” bills in several states that go beyond bills related to abortion.
HIGH SCHOOL OF SUCCUBUS SAVE FREE
However, tied in with the notion of protecting physicians’ free speech is now the notion that medical practitioners have the option of not providing care based on their own personal beliefs. In medicine, one cares for the patient in front of them irrespective of race, gender, gender identity, immigration status or political views. In other states, we have seen a very different approach in which medical boards and credentialing authorities are prohibited from taking action against a physician for publicly stating things that are incorrect and at variance with standard medical practice, under the guise of protecting physician free speech. However, such legislation was often challenged by members of the medical community and legally overturned. In some states, legislation was passed authorizing the potential discipline of physicians making inaccurate and potentially harmful statements related to COVID-19 care. In some circumstances, the conduct of physicians was referred to state medical boards. Leading medical organizations have advocated for licensing and credentialing bodies to take action against those giving potentially harmful advice publicly. The anti-vaccine stance of some physicians also drew the ire of the collective medical community.
Surprisingly, even in the face of clinical studies showing their lack of efficacy and potential harm, some physicians continued to advocate for their use, provoking critical comments from the Food and Drug Administration and different medical societies. This rigorous process helps ensure that the public will be cared for by a competent practitioner following typical standards of care.ĭuring the pandemic, at a time when the public was clamoring for COVID-19 treatments, nonproven interventions including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were proposed for use by some members of the medical community. In circumstances where practitioners are employed by hospitals and health care systems, additional measures may need to be satisfied for that individual to practice. To practice in specific states, the individual will undergo a review of their credentials and need to satisfy licensing requirements. For those training to be physicians, post-medical school rigorous residency and fellowship training occurs, and exams to certify competency in the specific specialty. Students in health care must pass special exams and medical board standards to graduate, helping to ensure that the individual is competent in their discipline. In the U.S., there are rigorous standards for the educational curriculum of those in medicine.
“If it is given me to save a life and save life wherever possible within reason this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty.” At medical school graduations across the country, the Hippocratic Oath or its modifications will be recited stating that we shall care for all: More than 2,000 years ago, Hippocrates framed principles of medical practice, which are foundational. The regulation and practice of medicine have been held in high esteem by the public and scientific community for millennia.
Yet, if a state-certified teacher used some of the writings of Pulitzer and Nobel Prize-winning author Toni Morrison, for example, speaking to high-school students about understanding community diversity and the impact on public health, that person could be subject to disciplinary action if a parent of a student in the class objects.
0 kommentar(er)
